Dr. Patrick Ryan

Course Schedule

Week 1 – January 7, 2025 – Course Introduction

Course Introduction and Group Formation

Week 2 – January 14, 2025 – Law and Power

Readings: P. Ryan, Prologue and s. 1.01-1.02 (to pg. 10) of Childhood and the Law in Canada.

P. Ryan, "holding, ruling, and decision"

P. Ryan, "A Model Brief of E. v. Eve in Point Form"

Lecture 1: Common Law Legal Systems


Breakout Session: Mooting Practice

Supplemental Resources:

Common Law Jurisdictions Globally 

Law School Success, What Should be Part of a Case Brief? (2014).

 

 *Advice: make flash cards for bold terms and cases to prepare for testing.

Lecture Terms and Concepts:

Law
statutory law
constitutional law
administrative law
international law

Jurisdiction
common law countries
common law systems
the common law

Case Law
stare decisis
leading cases
fact/law distinction
holding/judgment (ruling) distinction
jurisprudence
legally relevant facts
procedural history

Lecture Terms and Concepts:

 

Legal Doctrines

fiduciary duty

procedural fairness

parens patriae

Exemplary Case:

Baker v. Canada [1999] SCC

 Week 3 – January 21, 2025 – Parens Patriae and Eugenics

Readings: P. Ryan, complete Chapter 1 (to pg. 40) of Childhood and the Law in Canada.


Lecture 2: Parens Patriae and eugenics

Breakout Session: Mooting E. v. Eve (1986) SCC

Supplemental Resources:

The complete E. v. Eve report with P. Ryan’s Notations. An excerpt is available in s. 1.06 of Childhood and the Law in Canada.

Model Flash Card

Model Briefing Charts

Lecture Terms and Concepts:

amicus curiae
guardian ad litem
child's lawyer
 

parens patriae 
the best interests test
medieval wardship and land tenure
the early-modern origins of parens patriae


Sovereignty/Governmentality


Sovereignty
ideology
ideological movements
liberal critique

Governmentality
power/knowledge
discursive practices
The analytics of power
 

Eugenics

administrative eugenics

liberal eugenic governmentality

Donald E. Zarfas' discovery (pg. 8)

 

Exemplary Cases:


E. v. Eve [1986] SCC (Ch. 1)

Falkland v. Bertie [1696] UK (pgs. 19, 205)

Eyre v. Shaftsbury [1722] UK (pgs. 19, 205)


Buck v. Bell [1927] SCUS (pgs. 6, 10-17, 25, 204)

Holmes v. Powers [1968] KCA (pg. 9)

Stump v. Sparkman [1978] SCUS (pgs. 9, 25)

In re. Grady [1981] SCNJ (pgs. 9, 21, 26)

 

Muir v. Alberta [1996] ABQB (pgs. 1, 3, 8, 35-38)

Week 4 – January 28, 2025 – The Best Interests of the Child

Readings: P. Ryan, Chapter 2, Childhood and the Law in Canada.

 

Lecture 3: Custody, access, support and the best interests of children

Breakout Session: Mooting Van de Perre v. Edwards (2001) SCC

Supplemental Resources:

StatsCan Divorce Data 
Canadian Bar Association on BIC
The Divorce Act - Canada

The Family Law Act - Ontario

Federal Child Support Tables
Justice Canada, "Putting Children's Interests First"

Lecture Terms and Concepts:

 

The Best Interests of the Child Principle

substantive right to care

interpretive principle

rule of procedure (limited participatory right)

 

custody or “decision-making authority”
access or “parenting time”
scope of appellate review

material error

racial socialization

fiduciary duty and child support

paras formula

children's legal representation

parental alienation syndrome

Exemplary Cases:


Young v. Young [1992] SCC (pgs. 40-47, 73, 104)
B. (R.) v. C.A.S. Metro Toronto [1995] SCC (pg. 132)

Gordon v. Goertz [1996] SCC (pgs. 20, 46, 47, 62, 104)
Hickey v. Hickey [1999] SCC (pgs. 47, 61)
Van de Perre v. Edwards [2001] SCC (Ch. 2)
Willick v. Willick [1994] SCC (pgs. 40, 70-71, 104)

S. (D.B.) v. G. (S.R) [2010] SCC (pgs. 68, 71)
A.C. v M.Z. [2010] OSCJ
Farden v. Farden [1993] BCCJ
Bazinet v. Bazinet [1998] OCJ
S.(J.M.) v M.(F.J.) [2004] OSCJ
Mader v. McCormick [2018] ONCA
SGB. v. SJL [2010] OCJ

Week 5 – February 4, 2025 – International Family Law

Readings: P. Ryan, Chapter 3, Childhood and the Law in Canada.

Lecture 4: International borders and family law

Breakout Session: Mooting Ellis v. Wentzell-Ellis [2010) ONCA

Supplemental Resources:

UNCRC

 

 

Lecture Terms and Concepts:


Legal Coverture

The Hague Convention (HCCAICA)

habitual residence

   -parental intention

   -child-centeredness

   -hybrid approach

grave risk to an intolerable situation

   -expansive approach

   -restrictive approach


The Hague Conference (HCCH)
The Permanent Bureau (PB) of the HCCH

Pros and Cons of children’s participation in high-conflict family litigation


2020 PB of HCCH “Guide to Good Practice”

Exemplary Cases:


Thomson v. Thomson [1994] SCC (pgs. 15, 86-89, 95, 104, 110)
Langner v. Canada [1994] FCA

Baker v. Canada [1999] SCC

Ellis v. Wentzell-Ellis [2010] ONCA (Chapter 3)
Office of the Children’s Lawyer v. Balev [2018] SCC (pgs. 104-105)

Silva v. de Silva [2018] BCSC (pg. 105)

M. (R.) v. S. (J.) [2013] ABCA (pg. 107)

I. (A.M.R.) v. R. (K.E.) [2011] ONCA (pg. 107)

Pollastro v. Pollastro [1999] ONCA (pg. 111)

 

 

Week 6 – February 11, 2025 – Liberalism and the Decline of Corporal Punishment

Readings: P. Ryan, s. 4.01-4.03, Childhood and the Law in Canada.

Lecture 5: Liberalism, child rearing, and the decline of corporal punishment in Canada

Breakout Session:  Test 1 (15%)

Supplemental Resources:

Corporal Punishment Case Law Summary

Corporal Punishment Public Opinion

UNCRC

Lecture Terms and Concepts:


parental rights and legal coverture

doctrine of domestic chastisement

in loco parentis

family as the fundamental unit of society

 

The Canadian Criminal Code
s. 265, Criminal Code, 1985
s. 43, Criminal Code, 1985

 “force by way of correction”

 “reasonable under the circumstances”

Provincial Educational Policy on CP

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

s.7 (security of persons)

s.12 (punishment)
s.15 (equality under the law)

The UN CRC

s. 19, 24(3), 28(3), 37(1)

Exemplary Cases:


Rex v. Metcalfe [1927] SDC (pgs. 115-117)

R. v. Dupperon [1984] SCA (pgs. 116-118)

R. v. Ogg-Moss [1984] SCC (pgs. 118-121, 129)

Regina v. Hopley [1860] UK

R. v. Fritz and Fritz [1987] SKQB (pg. 144)

R. v. Wheeler [1990] Yukon CJ
R. v. Olsen [1990] OCJ

R. v. Bouillon [1993] QBCJ

R. v. Pickard [1995] BCCJ
R. v. Peterson [1995] OCJ (pgs. 118-121, 129)
R. v. Bell [2001] OCJ

Week 7 – February 18, 2025 – Reading Week

 

Week 8 – February 25, 2025 – Children’s Coverture and Parental Rights

Readings: P. Ryan, s. 4.04-4.09, Childhood and the Law in Canada.

Lecture 6: Coverture, fundamental units of society, and governmentality in Canada

 

Breakout Session: Mooting Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada

Supplemental Resources:

Educational Policies and Corporal Punishment in Canada and the World
Corporal Punishement Law Outside Canada

Global Map of CP law and practice

Lecture Terms and Concepts:


CCRF, principle of fundamental justice, s.7
CCRF, religious freedom, s. 2

CCRF, contextual approach, s. 15

 

McCombs, J – 10 points of consensus

C. Milne’s critique of McCombs’ Decision

The Majority Decision
reading down a statute

‘unreasonable’ CP in majority decision (para. 40)

 

Dissenting Opinions
Arbour on ‘security of persons’

Binnie on s. 1
CCRF, The Oakes Test, s. 1

Deschamps on ‘equality’

Exemplary Cases:


B.(R.) v. CAS Metro Toronto [1995] SCC (pg. 132)

Law v. Canada [1999] SCC (pgs. 124-138, 150-168, 265)

Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada [2000] OSCJ

R. v. Oakes [1986] SCC
Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada [2004] SCC

X. (G.) v. Yukon [2023] YKSC

 Week 9 – March 4, 2025 – Sex Crime and Children’s Evidence

Readings: P. Ryan, s. 5.01-5.05, Childhood and the Law in Canada.

Lecture 7: Rape and children’s evidence over the past 750 years

Breakout Session:  Test 2 (25%)

Supplemental Resources:



Lecture Terms and Concepts:


The origin of criminal justice, consent, & age
Traveling Courts: Eyres, Itineris, and Assizes

Statute of Westminster I and II

Henry de Bracton on ‘full age.’


The rationalization of proof
proof through compurgation

   -lesser law - wager of law and oath takers

   -greater law - trial by ordeal

evasions of trial
the development of trial by jury
hearsay rule

Exemplary Cases:


The Case of W.D. (1571)
The Case of Martyn Page (1603)
The Case of the Dells (1606)

The 1625 Case from Newgate Sessions
Rex. v. Travers [1726] UK
R. v. Brasier [1779] KB
R. v. Holmes [1861] UK

R. v. Wenland [1888] UK
R. v. Sankey [1927] SCC
R. v. Antrobus [1946] BCCA
R. v. Kendall [1962] SCC

Lecture Terms and Concepts:


The rise of ages of consent
1575 Acte to take awaye Cleargie from thoffendours in Rape and Burglarye
1828 Offences against Persons Act

1875 Offences against Persons Act
1885 Criminal Law Amendment Act
1892 Canadian Criminal Code
Amendments to CC 1920-1954

 

Lecture Terms and Concepts:


The decline of children’s competency
oaths, religious belief, and literacy
Matthew Hale’s Pleas of the Crown (1678)

1861 Offences against Persons Act
1889 Prevention and Protection of Cruelty to Children Act
1893 Canada Evidence Act
Wigmore on Evidence (1904)
Amendments to CC and CEA (1920-1927)

Week 10 – March 11, 2025 – The Revolution in Evidence and the Duty to Report
 

Readings: P. Ryan, s. 5.06-5.09, Childhood and the Law in Canada.

Lecture 8: The rediscovery of children’s evidence and the duty to report in Canada

Breakout Session:  Mooting R. v. Kaija [2007] ONCA

Supplemental Resources:



Lecture Terms and Concepts:


Redefining sexual crime
discourse of child sexual abuse
The Bagley Report (1984)
1985 reforms to the Criminal Code

sexual assault

sexual touching and sexual interference

Refining the idea of sexual consent

current staggered ages of sexual consent

relationships of trust and authentic consent

ages of sexual choice and exploitation

Exemplary Cases:


R. v. Bannerman [1966] MBCA, SCC

R. v. W.(R.) [1992] SCC (pg. 221)
R. v. Khan [1993] SCC (pgs. 221-223)

R. v. Marquard [1993] SCC (pg. 224)

R. v. F. (C.C.) [1997] SCC
R. v. Cortez [2013] ABCA
R. v. Thornton [2014] ONSC
R. v. Cook [1983] OCJ
Police Complaints Comm. v. Dunlop [1995] OCJ (pgs. 231-233)
Young v. Bella [2006] SCC (pgs. 233-34)

R. v. Kaija [2007] ONCA

Lecture Terms and Concepts:


New approaches toward testimony

secularization of oaths into promises

Elizabeth Loftus

 

The L20C Revolution in Evidence

Removal of oath-taking barrier (1988)

Prohibition of jury warnings (1993)

The Khan Rule

Presumption of competency (2006)

Establishment of Testimonial Aids (2006)

Provision of Witness Support

Adoption of Out-of-Court Statements

Regulation of Self-Representing Defendants

Lecture Terms and Concepts:


The Duty to Report
1940s X-Ray Studies
Henry Kempe
Battered Child Syndrome
Child Welfare Act (ON, 1965)
the DeLuca scandal
non-delegable statutory duty

fiduciary duty
professional duties

Week 11 – March 18, 2025 – The IRS and Childhood as a Weapon in Cultural Conflict

Readings: P. Ryan, s. 6.01-6.02, Childhood and the Law in Canada.


Lecture 9:  Indian Residential Schools and childhood as a weapon of cultural conflict
 

Breakout Session: Discussion of IRS

Supplemental Resources:



Lecture Terms and Concepts:


Alberni Indian Residential School
the cycle of violence

 

The Indian Act

Gradual Civilization Act 1857

Gradual Enfranchisement Act 1869

Status Indian

Department of Indian Affairs

 

The Indian Residential School Project

theory of modernization

theory of childhood socialization

early evidence of mission failure

6 areas of institutional failure before 1950

mortality rates and unmarked graves

cultural assimilation and language loss

sexual and physical abuse

 

Resistance, Change, & Closure

Student Protests

PowWow at Duck Lake (Film)

“Our Native Land” (CBC Radio)

Busing and Integration

“Statement of the Gov’t of Canada on Indian Policy” (1969)

“Red Paper” & “Citizens Plus”

IRS Closure in the 1970s

Exemplary Cases:

R. v. Plint [1995] BCJ

 

Week 12 – March 25, 2025 – The Law of Torts & Liability for IRS Harms

Readings: P. Ryan, s. 6.03-6.05, Childhood and the Law in Canada.


Lecture 10: Tort liability and the rights of cultural identity

Breakout Session: Mooting Blackwater v. Plint [2005] SCC

Supplemental Resources:



Lecture Terms and Concepts:

Tort Law

negligence

duty of care

breach of due care

proximate cause

foreseeable injury

loss resulting from injury

Anns Test

fiduciary duty

power over the beneficiary

unilateral action

loyalty

vicarious liability
The Salmond Test

non-delegable statutory duty

 

The Blackwater Trial

Royal Commission on IRS (1996)

excluding historical evidence

restricting interveners

rejecting the tort of cultural identity loss

charitable immunity

crown immunity for public policy

thin skull test (triggering)

crumbling skull test (pre-existing condition)

Exemplary Cases:


B. (W.R.) v. Plint [1998] BCSC
Bazley v. Curry  [1999] SCC (pgs. 257, 286)

Blackwater v. Plint [2001] BCSC

Myers v. Peel County Board 1981] SCC
Delgamuukw v. BC [1997] SCC

B. (K.L.) v. British Columbia [2003] SCC

Blackwater v. Plint [2005] SCC

 

 

Week 13 – April 1, 2025 – Tort Law, Languages Loss, and Cultural Rights

Readings: P. Ryan, s. 6.06-6.07, Childhood and the Law in Canada.


Lecture 11: Tort of Cultural Loss and Indigenous Cultural Rights

Breakout Session: Question Session for the Final Exam

Supplemental Resources:



Lecture Terms and Concepts:

decision, judgment, and holding

Assembly of First Nations

community mobilization and class action

Indian Residential School Settlement Agreement

Compensation Regime

Common Experience Payment

Independent Assessment Process

State Apology

Truth and Reconciliation Commission

contrasts with post-apartheid era

anti-judicial management of truth

motif of generational trauma
the survivor
CTA #4


Canada-Ontario Welfare Services Act (1965)

identity genocide

breach of contractual duty
children’s legal and social coverture


Indian Day School Settlement Agreement
Statutory use of ‘the best interests of the       child’ & Indigenous cultural rights

UN Dec. on the Rights of Ind. People (2007)

Exemplary Cases:

Brown v. Canada [2010] ONSC
Brown v. Canada [2017] ONSC
(pgs. 290-296)

 

McLean v. Canada [2019] FCJ (pgs. 296-297)


Re. An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit, and Metis children, youth, and families [2024] SCC. (pgs. 266, 299, 300, 301)